According to some rumors "ARUNDHATI ROY is believed to be working as Spokes person for the Naxals. And she is also working for them as a link between public and naxals, providing them with a possible future political support ."
Well they are just rumors but its also too hard to not believe it, particularly after her statements "Naxalism had to be an armed movement" ....“The poorest and most malnourished have waged a war against mighty corporates who want to have control over natural resources like minerals, water and forests. It’s the question of survival. We can make them (Naxals) win this war if we join them,”
If such a scholar is supporting such movements then we can realise that how those illiterate tribals will easily get motivated towards this movement.
For one instance let us believe that she is right, then how would she justify killings of 76 CRPF personals and almost 10 to 15 personals being killed thereafter, How would she justify blowing up the tracks that derailed GYANESHWARI EXPRESS which left over 100 common men dead.
Where was she when all those mishaps occured why didn't she gave statements against Naxals then or thus that mean it was all justified and right according to her.
We might not have the proofs of the rumors yet but all these happenings do make us believe those rumors.
I think she has no right left to remain an Indian her citizenship should be discarded off
I want to ask my readers,what they think of her and should she remain an Indian citizen
you should also look into the atrocities committed by crpf, rather than make a propaganda to make her not a citizen of india. and thank you for telling us that 'illeterate' tribals can actually be influenced by ideology. you should read up on the forest acts and how the british imperial taxation system is still followed to an extent when it comes to tribals. arundhati roy is an anarchist by nature. she is too much of an idealist to not see anarchistic society is the end and not the means in the real world. though i may not agree to some of what she might say, i will defend to death her right to say it. if not what is the difference between philippines and india? this is a democracy evolving into a fascist state slowly. i hope it remains a democracy where if communal hate speeches can be tolerated, so can she.
ReplyDeleteMy dear friends.. I m not agreed with your view
ReplyDeleteArundhati Roy may be wrong but not 100%... I think the way of protest by naxlites is wrong but not the protest... It can be well understood by the bureaucratic atrocities on the tribal ppl.. there are numerous examples starting from "exploitation of natural resources and tribal people without providing basic education, employement, health care facilities etc. by govt and corporate ppl" to "ignorance by govt and corporate ppl on any disaster in these areas(for e.g nuclear contamination in Jadugoda was completely ignored by govt for quite a long period) ...
naxalism is nt d answer!!in a democracy if maoists think dey hav d support den dey cn contest elections n win dem wid support of der arms...even naxals r ppl who hav greed fr power n wealth!INDIA today does nt hav a person who is commited fr devolopment...dey look 4 personal development!!f**k
ReplyDeleteI dont think contesting election will solve the problem. If protest can be done by only contesting and winning election then minority can never protest. what I feel that if these naxalites are getting public support then they can not be completely wrong and If govt and corporate ppl start taking interest in tribal's welfare then these naxalites will never get public support and naxalism will vanish for ever. for e.g - since last 4 years a significant reduction has been seen in naxal attacks in Bihar and this is because the govt. is giving attention to public welfare work and now villagers are considering the naxalism futile.
ReplyDelete@komarraju and shmjn93
ReplyDeleteProbably this will help u in getting inside story..
http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl2611/stories/20090605261103800.htm
Well she started off all well. and now she speaks to the international televisions about the "freedom struggle and democracy" . she even was in the "mass" of "world social forum" chorrusing the Lennon's beautiful lines. and such a perfectionist by herself ( she has given away her sydney peace price for the welfare of aborigins of australia)..she has all the character a good opportunist should do to flourish on this planet. she even tried to link the Bombay attack to the Kashmir and Gujarat Violence. and Naxalites well she even called them "Gandhians" . Naxilites are a group who doesnt have any ideology and are just after weapons now. she is rehearsing "deconstructions". she has her freedom thats for sure. she can use it for good reasons though.
ReplyDeleteThis is in reply to Sruthi... Which anarchy you are talking about...even anarchies have some code of conduct....you don't just pick up guns and start a revolution....We have had a history of revolutions (Bhagat Singh) but they were for a cause and they didn't kill common people like NAXALS...Killing innocent people is not a revolution..We are condemning Arundhati for supporting armed revolution of Naxals...
ReplyDeleteI don't deny that Naxalism started due to atrocities by our govt ...but today they are TERRORISTS supported by China...They don't want to benefit tribal they just want their support to disintegrate India
rashi... where did i say i support the rebels? if you dont understand simple words, dont reply. please.
ReplyDeletechina? ha ha.. disintegrate india? yes.. they are armed revolution people.
you can condemn arundhati for saying so. but one cannot say she needs to be chucked out.
as to killing innocent people... try and see the whole story next time you use the mainstream media.
Sruthi..thats what we are doing criticizing Arundhati for her senseless comments ....and for your very kind information just check out that in an internal annual report China has revealed it's ambitious plans to disintegrate India...China don't think of India as a country...it just thinks that it is a group of states uniting themselves to be called as India...its my sincere advise to you to check your GK first then comment on these serious forums...
ReplyDeleteplease do not mean bureaucratic negligence or ignorance or incapacity or unwillingness by 'bureaucratic atrocities'. you mean much by that copied expression.
ReplyDeleteto Roy- why do there exist pockets (literally many) in maoist strong holds if it is thee strategy?
@Rashi, where did you get the china made fact? inquisitive v.m. would like to mention that there is a Chinese belief on the contrary effect having India as the culprit. honestly i suspect Nepal to be a medium in the cases of funding. ;0. goi never pronounces china rather they say its illegal poppy, mining industries and extorting rural people including those tribal people. they get 14 billion Indian rupee by that mean each year (Pillai).
"The local government in Jharkhand came to power in part due to Maoist support. Though not openly supportive of the Naxalite cause, it has been hesitant to crack down on insurgents. As part of the rural population along the Red Corridor, Maoists will inevitably remain an element of eastern India’s political landscape." anyone mind this?
i dont know why u ppl fighting with other i think arundhati is not 100% wrong but naxalites r 100% wrong. i totally oppose wid naxalites .. i think for great indian army to solve this problem(naxals)is not a big deal.
ReplyDelete